Skip to main content

Rules of Engagement in Conflict--Rule #1

     Since conflict between people, even nations, is inevitable, we have to find ways to disagree in a respectful way.  Couples, coworkers, managers and direct reports, church folk, siblings, parents and kids, government officials, businesses and customers:  listen up!  Mutual respect is the key to having a meaningful dialogue when emotions are on the rise.  Remembering that the person or people on the other side of the debate have a brain and opinions too is imperative to keeping your emotions in check.  When we argue with people, it's because we feel that our views are the right ones.  Thus, saying to the other side, "You're wrong" in some way.
     Of course, I realize arguments aren't quite that simple.  They're fueled by wounded feelings, betrayal, and other ways we feel mishandled.  But at the core of every disagreement is simply that:  We don't agree.  And that's okay.  Really, it is.  News flash:  You can disagree with other people.  It's perfectly fine so don't lose your head over it.  Deal with it.  And that's the crux of the matter.  How do we deal with confrontation and conflict rationally?  Well, establishing rules of engagement up front will make a difficult conversation less confrontational.  Whether they are rules you can readily share with the other side or rules that you create for yourself, you've got to be prepared for when difficult conversations happen.  So today and over the next 24 blog posts, I'm going to share with you The 25 Rules of Engagement in Conflict.  Use them and modify them as you wish.  My company also trains on this topic to corporations so if you feel the need to expound on this, visit us at www.thesharpersolution.com.
     One rule that works well is to remember that a conversation is a dialogue, not a monologue.  Too often when people are in disagreement with each other, they try to out-talk the other person.  Of course both sides want to be heard.  Unfortunately, they both tend to talk at the same time so neither is listening to the other. When one side doesn't feel heard, they talk louder.  So in turn, the other side does the same.  Next thing you know, both sides are yelling at each other, and not one of them is hearing what the other is saying fully.  They get a few words and phrases here and there, and then they pounce on them.  Thus, leading to a misunderstanding of what was really meant.  The response to that misunderstanding is usually to be more hurtful than the other person.  A lot gets said that shouldn't, and nothing gets resolved.
     Do this:  Stop and listen.  Permit the other person to speak so that they can explain themselves fully.  Then respond.  Whenever you're given the opportunity to speak, make sure you don't monopolize the conversation.  Recognize that this really is a conversation, a dialogue.  And it takes two people to have one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Talk About Race: A Panel Discussion

When Your "Jokes" Get You in Trouble

         Everybody loves a good laugh. We feel better when we hear something funny and our anxiety or pain is eased because humor has come as a balm in a tense day. Laughter is beneficial to our emotional and physical health. Well-placed humor works easily in a lot of ways when we are telling stories, but can also come at a huge cost. If we joke about a topic that is sensitive to many, and we do it in a public forum where our intent can be misconstrued by the audience, then we can create a firestorm of frustration for ourselves and them.      A recent example of a humor faux pas involves rapper T.I. and his comments regarding how he checks for his daughter's virginity.  He claimed in a podcast that when his 18-year-old daughter goes to the gynecologist, he tells the doctor to check her hymen to make sure it's still intact--an indication that she is still a virgin. Though this is not an accurate test of virginity, T.I. says he told the doctor: "...just check the hymen

What Humility Sounds Like in Leadership

     To be in a position of leadership is usually associated with being in a position of power.  And though the power is real and necessary, it must be balanced with the willingness to respond humbly in situations that warrant it.  It's time we eliminate the misunderstanding that humility is weakness.  In fact, to take a position of humility takes a lot of restraint and sacrifice.  This is difficult for many to do.  Therefore, the weakness comes in yielding to arrogance and dominance because it is easy to do.  The strength is found in backing away from selfish desires and allowing someone else to be successful.      Not sure what humility looks like in leadership?  Consider these examples: The boss who gives credit to his employee for an idea that allowed the entire department to shine. The manager who was clearly wrong when making a decision on a project and admits that mistake when the project fails. The supervisor who yields her opinion to someone else on the team so tha